A brief history of social housing

Carrying on from my previous post about what is social housing?, I'm doing this follow up on how social housing has developed over the years. 

A whistle stop tour of social housing

Social housing has existed in England since 1890’s, in fact much longer before then in one form or another. It really took off with the Housing and Town Planning Act in 1919 making it law for Local Authorities to provide council housing. The Liberal Democrat government at the time initiated the first sustained effort to provide low cost affordable housing. They set a highly ambitious target to build 500,000 homes and failed miserably building only around half this number during their time in power. The subsequent Conservative and Labour governments shifted the focus on to private housing. Home building didn’t stop in the period up to the second world war with another 580,000 homes built, but it was after the second world war that social housing really soared with over a million homes built, four fifths of which were ‘council housing’(Shapely, n.d.; Wheeler, 2011).

The subsequent decades saw a shift towards replacing slum housing, rehousing people into ‘gleaming’ high rise towers and out of town overspill estates spurred on by the lack of land available in the central council areas. This new promised land turned out to be pretty bleak with problems rooted in poor design and substandard construction, as well as a lack of consultation about what people wanted by the town planners (Shapely, n.d.; Wheeler, 2011).

This changed in the late sixties, with council tenants becoming frustrated with the poor housing conditions and with their opinions overlooked began to organise themselves. Tenant groups sprang up in different parts of the country to object to the housing conditions being imposed on people, with limited success. Ultimately the Local Authorities realised that they were losing public confidence and as a result, a few began to develop tenant participation schemes with the very first tenant participation handbook developed in the mid seventies (Shapely, n.d.).

The Eighties ushered a resurgence in social housing, with the Conservative government, exploring alternatives to council housing, supporting initiatives with grants and encouraging private finance in the sector. This was the ideal opportunity for not for profit housing associations to invest into the sector by tapping into finance not traditionally available to the government This period also saw ‘right to buy’ take off with over 2 million council homes sold to tenants from the 1980’s to the present day. This sale of council housing highlighted the need for increased social housing, with housing waiting lists feeling the strain. The 1998 Housing Act helped create the present system, supporting housing associations in attracting investment and making it easier for them to collect rent for people entitled to housing benefit (Heywood, 2010).

The two decades since have seen local authorities transfer council housing to large scale voluntary trusts to attract private finance to improve stock. In this period Housing associations have attracted finance to develop new homes and improve existing ones (Heywood, 2010).

The sector has experienced frequent changes in its regulatory regime over the past few years with the introduction of a new regulatory framework and the decommissioning of two principle housing bodies; the Audit Commission and the Tenant Services Authority by December 2011. This affects how RSL’s will be regulated in the future, “with the arrangements for housing inspections still unclear” (Inside Housing 2010).

The announcements in the comprehensive spending review announced in October 2010 have also affected the sector, with RSL’s capital budgets for affordable house building reduced by 60%. This means that 7,000 less homes will be built over the next four years (Inside Housing 2010; Ropke 2010). Changes to the housing benefit system coming into force in 2013 are also expected to affect RSL’s incomes because a high number of social housing tenants are economically disadvantaged and in receipt of housing benefit (Audit Commission, 2010; Parliament UK).

Like i said this was a brief look at social housing has developed to what it is today, feel free to discuss. You may want to have a look at one of my previous posts social housing 2.0, which outlines the direction I think the sector should be looking to move towards to improve its image. See you next time, when I'm starting my series of continuous improvement posts starting with customer intelligence.

References

AUDIT COMMISSION, 2010. Housing Inspections. [online] Available at: <http://www.audit-commission.gov.uk/housing/inspection/pages/default.aspx> [cited 30 October 2011].

HEYWOOD, A., 2010, Investing in Social Housing, A Guide to the Development of the Affordable Housing Sector, The Housing Finance Sector [online] Available at: <http://thfcorp.com/investing/THFC%20-%20Investing%20in%20Social%20Housing%20230510.pdf> [cited 30 October 2011].

INSIDE HOUSING, 2010. The year that changed social housing forever. [online] Available at: <http://www.insidehousing.co.uk/> [cited 30 October 2011].

PARLIAMENT UK. 2010. Impact of the changes to Housing Benefit announced in the June 2010 Budget. [online] Available at: <http://www.publications.parliament.uk/> [cited 30 October 2011].

SHAPELY, P., N.D., Social housing and tenant participation. [online] Available at: <http://www.historyandpolicy.org/papers/policy-paper-71.html>

WHEELER, B., 2011, What future for social housing?, BBC [online] Available at: <http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-14380936> [cited 30 October 2011].

What is social housing?

I was halfway through working on my 'surveys' post on Digibored, when I realised that I’ve not actually described the social housing sector despite mentioning it frequently in this blog. So I’m course correcting and giving a short insight into what the social housing sector is. Digibored is about using technology and communication to improve and develop organisations. And I think it’s important to contextualise these topics, so I’m course correcting to set the scene for this blog.  

This post is a brief outline of what social housing is and I will be doing a follow up post on the history of social housing. Consider them my prequels to my earlier post called social housing 2.0.

So, what is social housing?

Simply put, social housing is housing usually owned by councils, housing association or other not for profit organisations such as cooperatives. These organisations provide affordable rental accommodation to vulnerable people and those on a low income (Directgov, n.d.; BBC, 2007).

Almost 1 in 5 people in England live in social housing. Traditionally social housing customers have experienced limited mobility due to demand for social housing exceeding supply. Because there is so much demand for social housing, it’s allocated according to need. Preference is given to the more vulnerable sectors of our society with a sliding scale used to rate housing need. The more points an applicant has on the rating system, the higher they are on the ‘housing list’ (Local Governments Association 2008; Shelter, 2011; Survey of English Housing 2008)

Who owns it?

Social housing is often perceived as ‘council housing’ by the average person, a point I picked up on in social housing 2.0, but in reality social housing is owned and managed by several different types of organisations. For example in central Manchester, there are 67,420 social housing properties. The following table highlights the different types of companies that own and manage these properties (stats taken from Housing Net)

Type of Organisation	Number of Properties Owned
Arms Length Management Organisations	29,029
Charities or Charitable Organisations	224
Co-operatives	203
Housing Associations	37,779
Other	185
Total	67,420

The majority of the stock is owned by Housing Associations and Arms Length Management Organisations, so this is the bit where I tell you what they are:

Housing Associations

Housing Associations also known as resident social landlords are usually not for profit organisations that own and manage properties acquired through local authority housing stock transfers and by developing properties. (Directgov).

Arms Length Management Organisations (ALMO’s)

ALMO’s are organisations created by local authorities to manage and improve its housing stock. The local authorities retain the ownership of the properties and the ALMO looks after the day-to-day management of the properties dealing with issues like repairs and rental queries.

So this is it! A very brief look at what social housing is. It’s a very broad subject and I’ve only tried to include things that help set a context for the blog. As I mentioned earlier, the next post is about the history of social housing… see you on the flip sideJ.

References

BBC, 2007, Q&A: Social housing. [online] [retrieved 28 October 2011] <http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/6691927.stm>

 

COMMUNITIES & LOCAL GOVERNMENT, 2009. Survey of English Housing Preliminary Results 2007/08. [online] [retrieved 28 October 2011] <http://www.communities.gov.uk/publications/corporate/statistics/sehprelimresults0708>

DIRECTGOV. N.D., Housing Associations – what are they. [online] [retrieved 28 October 2011] <http://www.direct.gov.uk/en/HomeAndCommunity/Councilandhousingassociationhomes/Housingassociationhomes/DG_188384>

LOCAL GOVERNMENTS ASSOCIATION, 2008. COUNCILS AND THE HOUSING CRISIS: The potential impacts and knock-on effects of the credit crunch on councils and their housing role [online] [retrieved 28 October 2011] <http://www.lga.gov.uk/lga/aio/569196>

SHELTER, 2011, What is social housing,[online] [retrieved 28 October 2011] <http://england.shelter.org.uk/campaigns/housing_issues/Improving_social_housing/what_is_social_housing>

8DZFQ5F48GNB

STOCKPORT HOMES, 2010, What is an ALMO, [online] [retrieved 28 October 2011] <http://www.stockporthomes.org/main.cfm?type=WHATISANALMO>

Social Housing 2.0

Earlier this year the Chartered Institute of Housing ran a competition asking the question:

"How do we tackle the problem that the word ‘social’ is good when followed by ‘networking’ and bad when followed by ‘housing’?"

 The competition came and went and working in the social housing sector myself, it got me thinking, how can we use social media to improve the perceptions of social housing, so here's my 'entry' on digibored if you will, have a read and let me know what you think:

"Enter Social Housing 2.0: How we can use the power of our crowd to change perceptions of social housing"

‘Social networking’, is the current buzzword and as housing professionals we are getting LinkedIn in the sector with Facebook and Twitter impacting our personal lives. The genius behind social networking is that it places the ability to communicate easily at our fingertips. 

‘Social housing’, at its core is about offering affordable housing to vulnerable and economically disadvantaged people. Almost a fifth of people in England live in ‘social housing’. However this term brings up connotations of high-rises and run down areas and well it’s all ‘council housing’ innit to ‘Joe Bloggs’.  

To change perceptions we need to ask ourselves a couple of questions. Firstly, how ‘social’ is social housing? Well we may not always knock on a tenant’s door for a cuppa, but we do let tenants into ‘our house’, could you as a mortgage holder consult on your lenders governance and their service standards? Our tenants can. We work within our local communities, supporting local resident groups, promoting financial inclusion and reduce worklessness to build sustainable neighbourhoods, impacting whole communities not just our tenants.

Secondly, how networked are we? Do we talk to the right people in the right way at the right time?  The answer is no, despite being good communicators; we predominately just talk to our tenants and each other. Mr Jones at number 42 may ‘get us’ but we don’t really chat with Mr. Bloggs outside of our social housing universe.

So how do we change perceptions? The first step is acceptance, we need to accept that the term ‘social housing’ carries a negative perception and it’s time to refresh the concept, its time to rebrand… enter ‘Social Housing 2.0’. The second step is trust; trust in the power of our crowd which is a fifth of households in England.

Our tenants are our most enthusiastic advocates but on the whole, most of us are not providing the means to communicate their experiences and pride of being social housing tenants. Social networking places the world at people’s fingertips, but our sector isn’t taking advantage of these tools. We have been slow to introduce online services, and to adopt social networking, these services are seen as peripheral in most housing organisations.

We need to trust in our crowd to change perceptions by giving them a better voice to communicate the good and bad aspects of social housing. This is a courageous step for the sector but let’s seriously look at providing services at our customer’s fingertips to enable them to openly critique us. I don’t know if the term ‘Social Housing 2.0’ will be viewed as positive or negative but it will be powered by the honest view of our crowd and that’s how perceptions will change".

Well there you go, this is my entry, there's many way to lift perceptions of social housing, some people argue that we should follow more traditional media streams by developing better press links or launch television stations for social housing tenants. This is something I plan to explore in a future blog. I mentioned crowdsourcing in my 'entry' several times, so I’ll be talking about crowdsourcing as well as User Generated Content later this week. Thanks for reading...